removing heatsink with Arctic Silver Ceramique...?

[George Macdonald]

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:34:45 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:14:01 -0500, George Macdonald wrote: On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:55:31 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:42:19 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:<snip all content>>>Richard Hopkins>>Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom>>(replace .nospam with .com in reply address)>>>>The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com>>Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com>> I'm not sure how other people feel about direct advertising in this> newsgroup but I'm sure there are a number of other people -- not me -- who> would like to benefit from the privilege if accorded. If it comes to a> question of all or none I'd think the choice would have to be the latter...> but maybe others can comment??I think the usual Usenet rules are to allow a short advert in the siggy. DABS is probably the largest computer parts e-tailer in the U.K. I don't think we need this... or expect NewEgg, Monarch, Dell<gawp>, Overclockers.xxxx et.al. to follow. I can't find a newsgroup charter and the guidelines are: if you can't find a FAQ, don't do it.Though a siggy delimiter (dash-dash-space) would be ,umm nice George! ;-) I've been thinking about dropping mine for a bit now - probably given the poor folks searching on the keywords enough bother.:-)I wasn't talking about your sig, though it is getting nigh on six years*old*. I was referring to your lack of the signature delimiter, the lackof which is just short of top-posting on the Usenet agravation list. ;-)

That bad?... tsk...tsk - doesn't seem to be well respected or even
documented but there are so many broken links in the Usenet docs now. The
sig extension is gone anyway.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald

[keith]

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:19:54 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:34:45 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:14:01 -0500, George Macdonald wrote: On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:55:31 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:>On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:42:19 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:>><snip all content>>>>>Richard Hopkins>>>Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom>>>(replace .nospam with .com in reply address)>>>>>>The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com>>>Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com>>>> I'm not sure how other people feel about direct advertising in this>> newsgroup but I'm sure there are a number of other people -- not me -- who>> would like to benefit from the privilege if accorded. If it comes to a>> question of all or none I'd think the choice would have to be the latter...>> but maybe others can comment??>>>I think the usual Usenet rules are to allow a short advert in the siggy. DABS is probably the largest computer parts e-tailer in the U.K. I don't think we need this... or expect NewEgg, Monarch, Dell<gawp>, Overclockers.xxxx et.al. to follow. I can't find a newsgroup charter and the guidelines are: if you can't find a FAQ, don't do it.>Though a siggy delimiter (dash-dash-space) would be ,umm nice George! ;-) I've been thinking about dropping mine for a bit now - probably given the poor folks searching on the keywords enough bother.:-)I wasn't talking about your sig, though it is getting nigh on six years*old*. I was referring to your lack of the signature delimiter, the lackof which is just short of top-posting on the Usenet agravation list. ;-) That bad?... tsk...tsk - doesn't seem to be well respected or even documented but there are so many broken links in the Usenet docs now. The sig extension is gone anyway.

Have you ever noticed that my sig, as humble as it is, dissapears when you
reply? That's the sig-delimiter (dash-dash-space) at work. See how
yours just went poof? ...t'wasn't me!

--
Keith

Now you try replying, this crappy siggy will go *poof* too ;-)

[George Macdonald]

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:18:14 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:19:54 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:
That bad?... tsk...tsk - doesn't seem to be well respected or even documented but there are so many broken links in the Usenet docs now. The sig extension is gone anyway.Have you ever noticed that my sig, as humble as it is, dissapears when youreply? That's the sig-delimiter (dash-dash-space) at work. See howyours just went poof? ...t'wasn't me!-- Keith Now you try replying, this crappy siggy will go *poof* too ;-)

Hmmm, Free Agent doesn't care... apparently. I keep meaning to buy the
damned thing but now with that and no quote level limiting, I dunno.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald

[keith]

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:45:56 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:18:14 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:19:54 -0500, George Macdonald wrote: That bad?... tsk...tsk - doesn't seem to be well respected or even documented but there are so many broken links in the Usenet docs now. The sig extension is gone anyway.Have you ever noticed that my sig, as humble as it is, dissapears when youreply? That's the sig-delimiter (dash-dash-space) at work. See howyours just went poof? ...t'wasn't me!-- Keith Now you try replying, this crappy siggy will go *poof* too ;-)
Hmmm, Free Agent doesn't care... apparently. I keep meaning to buy the damned thing but now with that and no quote level limiting, I dunno.

Strange. There was supposed to be an Earth shattering kaboom!
(Free) Agent used to work. I was going to buy Agent, but decided to try
Gravity first. Though Gravity is not perfect I never went back to Agent,
free or otherwise.

--
Keith