jp
07-02-2003, 03:58 PM
Hi,
although code inspection and walkthroughs are done, white box testing is
still a must.
During code inspection, it is too easy to loose specifications/requirements.
Also walktrhough
are normally performed for sunny day scenarios and maybe some general error
scenarios.
The vast vajority of code is still written for error scenarios with
walkthrough do not always
covers.
With all the best CI and walktrough, white box testing is still required.
Cheers,
JP
"Prof. Mo" <rodmoten@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:b9fdd764.0307020919.5ccf8e10@posting.google.com... Hi, I'm new to software testing research. It seems to me that it would be pointless to perform white box coverage methods if code inspections and walkthroughs are done. Is this an ideology held by many people in practice? Rod
although code inspection and walkthroughs are done, white box testing is
still a must.
During code inspection, it is too easy to loose specifications/requirements.
Also walktrhough
are normally performed for sunny day scenarios and maybe some general error
scenarios.
The vast vajority of code is still written for error scenarios with
walkthrough do not always
covers.
With all the best CI and walktrough, white box testing is still required.
Cheers,
JP
"Prof. Mo" <rodmoten@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:b9fdd764.0307020919.5ccf8e10@posting.google.com... Hi, I'm new to software testing research. It seems to me that it would be pointless to perform white box coverage methods if code inspections and walkthroughs are done. Is this an ideology held by many people in practice? Rod