LCD versus CRT

[Dave Plowman]

In article <f5c910114c.Philip@borehamh.demon.co.uk>,
Philip Draper <Philip@borehamh.demon.co.uk> wrote: Are 'full size' LCDs as difficult as this? Are they usable for dealing with photographic images, or would I do better to stick to my excellent but ageing Iiyama CRT monitor?

Everything being equal, a CRT still gives better results. If size weight
and power consumption matter then the LCD is a better bet.

--
*A backward poet writes inverse.*

Dave Plowman dave.sound@argonet.co.uk London SW 12
RIP Acorn

[J.C. Conner]

In message <4c11d0f204dave.sound@argonet.co.uk>
Dave Plowman <dave.sound@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
In article <f5c910114c.Philip@borehamh.demon.co.uk>, Philip Draper <Philip@borehamh.demon.co.uk> wrote: Are 'full size' LCDs as difficult as this? Are they usable for dealing with photographic images, or would I do better to stick to my excellent but ageing Iiyama CRT monitor? Everything being equal, a CRT still gives better results.

... better headaches!

Jonathan

P.S. memory probably playing tricks but haven't we been here before?
Perhaps it was on Archive-on-line.

--
Internet access with RISC OS : jcconner@ntlworld.com <J.C. Conner>

The likelihood of a hard disk crash is directly proportional to the
value of the data that has not been backed up.

[Ian Molton]

On 14 Jul 2003 11:33:18 -0700
banditstan2000@yahoo.co.uk (Garry) wrote:
I would also be worried about dead pixels on LCDs, policies abot returning screens vary a lot, and personally I find even one dead pixel very annoying indeed.

'it was like that when I got it out of the box'

Works wonders.

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.