In article <1160479279.353849.311230@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>,
"Vladimir Trushkin" <trushkin@tut.by> wrote:
Quote:
|
Hello, You are probably aware of the problem when people are reporting issues that lately considered as not a problem or duplicate to already reported ones. Mostly, this is the result of incorrect test design and wrong understdnading of software requirements or a product of too many people working on same area and producing duplicates. Sometimes this is just a typical human mistake: not following test steps, confusing correct results with incorrect, etc. I any case I am taking it as a rewok that could be avoided with right process and due management. I just wanted to know from professionals who are tracking the amount of such reports what is the percentage of such reports that they think is tolerable?
|
in one of my organisatons, we found that duplicates hovering around the
10% mark were enough of a nuisance to install a filter guy. sadly, they
were not enough of a nuisance to install reasonable testing prior to
integration so we got what we deserverd.
in another organisation, duplicates were so rare that hardly anybody
bothered counting them, and when they occured, those defects were simply
closed with a text reference: duplicate report see ticket 1234567, or
some such. no sweat, no percentages (probably 1-2 %, tops)
how bad is yours?
mats
Quote:
|
Thanks in advance for the answers. ---- Best WIshes, Vladimir
|