IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
Geneseo is Intel's proposed extension to PCI-Express and a competitor
to AMD's Torrenza initiative. IBM is also a supporter of Torrenza. So
as usual, IBM has its hands in both camps.
IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
On 2 Oct 2006 10:10:55 -0700, "YKhan" <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Geneseo is Intel's proposed extension to PCI-Express and a competitorto AMD's Torrenza initiative. IBM is also a supporter of Torrenza. Soas usual, IBM has its hands in both camps.NE Asia Online 2006 Oct 03 : IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCIExpress Computing Standardhttp://neasia.nikkeibp.com/dailynewsdetail/005291
So does this mean that CSI will be/is a hacked low-latency version of
PCI-e?;-)
IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:19:08 -0400, George Macdonald
<fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 2 Oct 2006 10:10:55 -0700, "YKhan" <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Geneseo is Intel's proposed extension to PCI-Express and a competitorto AMD's Torrenza initiative. IBM is also a supporter of Torrenza. Soas usual, IBM has its hands in both camps.NE Asia Online 2006 Oct 03 : IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCIExpress Computing Standardhttp://neasia.nikkeibp.com/dailynewsdetail/005291
So does this mean that CSI will be/is a hacked low-latency version ofPCI-e?;-)
Well....it was already thus, without the proposal ;-)
The proposal may be one result of Intel deciding to open up CSI...
IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
daytripper wrote:
Quote:
So does this mean that CSI will be/is a hacked low-latency version ofPCI-e?;-) Well....it was already thus, without the proposal ;-) The proposal may be one result of Intel deciding to open up CSI...
Except that Geneseo also applies to FSB, not just CSI.
IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
On 3 Oct 2006 07:27:18 -0700, "YKhan" <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
daytripper wrote:
Quote:
So does this mean that CSI will be/is a hacked low-latency version ofPCI-e?;-) Well....it was already thus, without the proposal ;-) The proposal may be one result of Intel deciding to open up CSI...
Except that Geneseo also applies to FSB, not just CSI. Yousuf Khan
Of course it does.
Wait - what did you think would be used for the "FSB" on a CSI machine?
IBM, Intel Propose Extension to PCI Express Computing Standard
"daytripper" <day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6b25i25ldocgk7os5aar4vctub0fei2jou@4ax.com...
Quote:
On 3 Oct 2006 07:27:18 -0700, "YKhan" <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
daytripper wrote:
Quote:
>So does this mean that CSI will be/is a hacked low-latency version >of >PCI-e?;-) Well....it was already thus, without the proposal ;-) The proposal may be one result of Intel deciding to open up CSI...
Except that Geneseo also applies to FSB, not just CSI. Yousuf Khan
Of course it does. Wait - what did you think would be used for the "FSB" on a CSI machine? /daytripper
In fact, I bet CSI and HT3 are to all intents and purposes equivilent.
And no I don't know anything much about CSI so no NDA involved.
The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not
be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained
on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation
of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for
the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications
of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an
attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note
that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see
on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com
Term of Service